Sexual Assault Trials Handbook
Home
Table of contents
Recent updates
Search for:
Relevant literature — non-legal articles
Table of Contents
[7-500]
Impact and sequelae of child sexual abuse
[7-500]
The long-term effects of child sexual abuse — J Cashmore and R Shackel
[7-520]
The dynamics of child sexual abuse
[7-520]
Understanding children’s medium for disclosing sexual abuse — R Shackel
[7-540]
How child victims respond to perpetrators of sexual abuse — R Shackel
[7-560]
‘Because she’s one who listens’: children discuss disclosure recipients in forensic interviews — L Malloy, S Brubacher and M Lamb
[7-580]
A retrospective analysis of children’s assessment reports: what helps children tell? — R McElvaney and M Culhane
[7-600]
Children’s disclosure of sexual abuse: a systematic review of qualitative research — S Morrison, C Bruce and S Wilson
[7-620]
Disclosure of child sexual abuse: delays, non-disclosure and partial disclosure — R McElvaney
[7-640]
Factors that prevent, prompt, and delay disclosures in female victims of child sexual abuse — N Kellogg, W Koek and S Nienow
[7-660]
Barriers and facilitators to disclosing sexual abuse in childhood and adolescence — C Lemaigre, E Taylor and C Gittoes
[7-680]
Child sexual abuse and the criminal law
[7-680]
Child witnesses: the judicial role — J Cashmore
Child witnesses: the judicial role — Judy Cashmore
[7-700]
Child Sexual Abuse and the Criminal Justice System: What Educators Need to Know — C Eastwood
[7-720]
Consequences of criminal court involvement for child victims — J Quas and G Goodman
[7-740]
Child sexual assault trials: a survey of juror perceptions — J Cashmore and L Trimboli
[7-760]
What Australian jurors know and do not know about evidence of child sexual abuse — J Goodman-Delahunty, N Martschuk and A Cossins
[7-780]
Validation of the Child Sexual Abuse Knowledge Questionnaire — J Goodman-Delahunty, N Martschuk and A Cossins
[7-800]
Courtroom questioning of child sexual abuse complainants — N Westera et al
[7-820]
Judges’ delivery of ground rules to child witnesses in Australian courts — B Earhart et al
[7-840]
An evaluation of how evidence is elicited from complainants of child sexual abuse — M Powell et al
[7-860]
The prosecution of child sexual assault in NSW
[7-860]
Fourteen-year trends in the criminal justice response to child sexual abuse reports in NSW — J Cashmore, A Taylor and P Parkinson
[7-880]
Sentencing and treatment of juvenile sex offenders in Australia — R Blackley and L Bartels
[7-900]
Victim impact statements in child sexual assault cases: a restorative role or restrained rhetoric? — R Shackel
[7-920]
Institutional child sexual abuse
[7-920]
The social dynamics and impacts of institutional child sexual abuse — D Kenny
[7-940]
Memory science in the
Pell
appeals: impossibility, timing, inconsistencies — J Goodman-Delahunty, N Martschuk and M Nolan
[7-960]
Investigation and interviewing children in child sexual abuse cases
[7-960]
Principles to enhance communication with child witnesses — M Powell and B Earhart
[7-980]
Empirical guidance on the effects of child sexual abuse on memory and complainants’ evidence — J Goodman-Delahunty, M Nolan and E van Gijn Grosvenor
[7-1020]
Challenges facing child witnesses: special measures, witness assistance and intermediaries
[7-1020]
Special measures in child sexual abuse cases: views of Australian criminal justice professionals — N Westera et al
[7-1040]
Recording evidence and evidentiary issues in child sexual abuse cases
[7-1040]
The ‘good old days’ of courtroom questioning: changes in the format of child cross-examination questions — R Zajac, N Westera and A Kaladelfos
[7-1060]
Disorder in the courtroom? Child witnesses under cross-examination — R Zajac, S O’Neill and H Hayne
[7-1080]
Sexual assault: forensic examination in the living and deceased — C Lincoln
[7-1100]
Forensic medical evaluation of children who present with suspected sexual abuse — G Wong
[7-1120]
The role of photographic and video documentation in the investigation and prosecution of child sexual assault — A Cossins et al
[7-1140]
Factors associated with child sexual abuse confirmation at forensic examinations — W Silva et al
[7-1180]
How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers — G Edmond et al
[7-1200]
Model forensic science — G Edmond et al
[7-1220]
Forensic science evidence, wrongful convictions and adversarial process — D Hamer and G Edmond
[7-1240]
Mock jury and juror responses to uncharged acts of sexual misconduct — J Goodman-Delahunty and N Martchuk
[7-1260]
Jury reasoning in separate and joint trials of institutional child sexual abuse — J Goodman-Delahunty, A Cossins and N Martschuk
[7-1280]
Methods to evaluate justice practices in eliciting evidence from complainants of child sexual abuse — J Goodman-Delahunty et al
[7-1300]
Inconsistencies in complainants’ accounts of child sexual abuse arising in their cross-examination — A Pichler et al
[7-2000]
Adult victims of sexual assault
[7-2000]
Rape myths as barriers to fair trial process — E McDonald
[7-2100]
Misconceptions of sexual crimes against adult victims — P Tidmarsh and G Hamilton
[7-9500]
Further reading
[7-9500]
Further reading — non-legal