Home
Contents
Recent updates
View PDF
Search for:
Criminal — articles
Holistic approaches to reduce recidivism in young offenders
J Ravulo
[20-1000]
Introduction
Social and welfare needs of young offenders
Significant social and welfare needs
Interactions with youth justice system
Holistic approaches to deterring recidivist offending
Individual, community and organisational capacity building
Developing the skills of the individuals (economic capital)
Developing the community to promote cohesion (social capital)
Developing organisations and institutions to be responsive (cultural capital)
Conclusion
What makes juvenile offenders different from adult offenders
K Richards
[20-2000]
Foreword
Introduction
How juvenile offending differs from adult offending
The proportion of crime perpetrated by juveniles
Growing out of crime: the age-crime curve
Juvenile offending trajectories
The proportion of juvenile who come into contact with the criminal justice system
The types of offences that are perpetrated by juveniles
The nature of juvenile offending
Why juvenile offending differs from adult offending
Risk-taking and peer influence
Intellectual disability and mental illness
Young people as crime victims
The challenge of responding to juvenile crime
Juvenile offenders have complex needs
Juvenile offenders require a higher duty of care
Juveniles may grow out of crime
Juvenile justice interventions
The doctrine of doli incapax
Welfare and justice approaches to juvenile justice
Reducing stigmatisation
Addressing juveniles’ criminogenic needs
Diversion of juveniles
Avoiding peer contagion
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Specific deterrent effect of custodial penalties on juvenile reoffending
D Weatherburn, S Vignaendra and A McGrath
[20-3000]
Executive summary
Introduction
Deterrence theory
The evidence on specific deterrence
The present study
Survey procedure
Response rate and subject attrition
Variables
Analysis
Results
Conclusion
Appendix
References
Doli incapax — the criminal responsibility of children
M Johnston and R Khalilizadeh
[20-4000]
The age of criminal responsibility
The test for rebutting doli incapax
RP v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 641
The test developed from RP
The erroneous presumption of normality
Rebutting the presumption of doli incapax
Statements/admissions made by the child
Behaviour of the child before and after the act
Prior criminal history
Evidence of parents/ background
Evidence of teachers
Evidence of psychologists and psychiatrists
Concluding observations